ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Analysis and validation of characteristic genes in RNA sequencing datasets from heart failure patients based on multiple algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with heart failure (HF) have a poor prognosis and continue to pose a global threat to human health. Consequently, it is crucial to employ bioinformatic approaches to analyze functional alterations within the transcriptome. This analysis should be conducted in conjunction with transcriptome sequencing data from a large sample of clinical myocardial tissue, in order to identify the core pathogenic mechanisms in heart failure myocardial tissue. Method: Transcriptome data from HF patient myocardial biopsies underwent Robust Rank Aggregation (RRA) to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). These DEGs were intersected with key genes identified via Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) in HF. Functional enrichment analysis was performed on the DEGs. Selected key genes were experimentally validated using RT-qPCR in hypertrophic cardiomyocyte models. Single-cell data dimensionality reduction, clustering, and visualization were achieved using Principal component analysis (PCA) and uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP). Cell types were annotated with SingleR and CellMarker, and single-cell functional enrichment was performed using the "irGSEA" R package. Results: RRA of transcriptome data from five studies identified 102 DEGs. Functional enrichment analyses (GO, KEGG, GSEA) revealed associated functional alterations. WGCNA highlighted a key module enriched for energy metabolism-related genes, with the mitochondrial matrix and inner membrane identified as their primary subcellular locations. Integrating RRA-derived DEGs with WGCNA key module genes yielded 14 crucial genes, validated experimentally in a hypertrophic cardiomyocyte model. Analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data identified cold shock domain containing C2 (CSDC2) and Single-pass membrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 4 (SMCO4) as cardiomyocyte-specific genes within this set. Subpopulations of cardiomyocytes with high or low expression of SMCO4 and CSDC2 showed strong associations with alterations in fatty acid metabolism, adipogenesis, and oxidative phosphorylation pathways. Conclusion: Integrated transcriptomic analysis identified 12 key genes linked to HF, which were validated in a hypertrophy model. Single-cell data showed SMCO4 and CSDC2 are specifically expressed in cardiomyocytes and regulate fatty acid metabolism. This suggests SMCO4 and CSDC2 contribute to HF by altering fatty acid metabolism in heart cells, revealing new disease mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.