ArticleCirculation reports2025
Self-Reported Sleep Quality and Circadian Rest-Activity Patterns in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.
Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Poor sleep quality is a critical concern for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between sleep quality and circadian rest-activity patterns in patients with CIEDs in Japan. Methods and Results: Fifty-four patients with CIEDs were recruited. Sleep quality was assessed using the Japanese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, with scores ≤5 (n=19 participants) and ≥6 (n=35 participants) indicating good and poor sleep quality, respectively. Participants were instructed to wear 'Life Microscope' wristbands for 3 days at home to track their activity levels. Hourly mean values were calculated for the metabolic equivalents from the obtained activity levels, and subsequently evaluated using cosine periodic regression analysis. Parameters of circadian rest-activity patterns analyzed included mesor (mean activity), amplitude (range of activity), and acrophase time (time of peak activity). Sleep metrics, including total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and number of awakenings, were also evaluated. The Mann-Whitney U test showed that the poor sleep quality group exhibited significantly lower mesor, smaller amplitude, and later acrophase time. No other significant between-group differences were found. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis showed that acrophase time remained independently associated with self-reported sleep quality. Conclusions: Focusing on improving daily activity levels and adjusting acrophase time may be essential to improve sleep quality in patients with CIEDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.