ReviewPsychoradiology2025
Towards closed-loop precision psychiatry: Integrating MRI biomarkers for individualized care of major depressive disorder.
Review in Psychoradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Common alterations of whole and subregion-specific amygdala intrinsic functional connectivity across psychiatric disorders: a meta-analysis.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on spatial memory: a systematic review across animal and human studies.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Brain functional network correlates and predictors of the perioperative antidepressant effect of esketamine in breast cancer patients: a double-blind randomized controlled trial using resting-state fMRI and graph theory.Translational psychiatry · 2026Trial
- Dynamic limbic-executive decoupling underpins the reciprocal link between drug-resistant state and depression in temporal lobe epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Functional and structural connectivity of thalamic subnuclei in major depressive disorder at 7 Tesla.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
- Brain-predicted age difference is associated with the progression of subthreshold depression: evidence from the UK Biobank.Psychoradiology · 2026Article
- Precision neurodiversity: personalized brain network architecture as a window into cognitive variability.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers have shown considerable potential in elucidating the neurobiological underpinnings of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, clinical translation of these biomarkers remains limited due to reliance on group-level analyses, which fail to capture the individual variability inherent in MDD. Precision psychiatry, which advocates for individualized approaches, offers a framework that could enhance the clinical utility of MRI biomarkers across multiple domains, including diagnostic classification, treatment response prediction, and individualized interventions. Despite this potential, current research applying MRI biomarkers to MDD within the framework of precision psychiatry remains fragmented, lacking an integrated clinical system that seamlessly combines these components. This review introduces the concept of a closed-loop clinical system, emphasizing the integration of diagnostic classification, treatment response prediction, and individualized interventions into a unified approach at the individual patient level. We summarize recent advances in these three clinical domains, highlight existing fragmentation, and discuss the challenges of achieving a cohesive system. Finally, we propose that the integration of MRI biomarkers into a closed-loop clinical system, as envisioned by precision psychiatry, holds great promise for the individualized management of MDD, improving clinical outcomes from diagnosis through recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.