Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40933775›Full record

ReviewCJC pediatric and congenital heart disease2025

A Discourse on Percutaneous Closure of the Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Premature Neonates: Controversy, Remedy, or Paradox of Choice?

Wisam Abozaid, Souvik Mitra, Bonny Jasani, Lee Benson, Steven Lee Rathgeber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wisam AbozaidDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Souvik MitraDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Bonny JasaniDepartment of Neonatology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lee BensonDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, the Labatt Family Heart Centre, the Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto School of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Steven Lee RathgeberDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether conversations about the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) are engaging and productive or controversial and inconclusive, they are commonplace within the neonatal intensive care unit. "To close or not to close" is often the final question that concludes these conversations. Even in the era when surgical closure was the only option for intervention, a consensus on the best management was typically difficult to achieve. The development and widespread adoption of percutaneous PDA closure in premature neonates has now added a new dimension to these conversations and converted the binary question to a more nuanced process that incorporates less invasive options. Because the procedure has been well established and shown to be safe in appropriately selected babies, it is timely to consider what, if any, aspects of the decision-making process have changed in the premature neonate. This article is a comprehensive review of the current literature on the minimally invasive transcatheter PDA closure procedure in premature babies and aims to examine the impact of this procedure on clinical decision-making in neonatology practice.

Identifiers

PMID40933775
PMCPMC12418262

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.