ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Smart materials: innovative strategies for oral-maxillofacial bone defects repair.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances of piezoelectric biomaterials in bone defect repair: The role of direct and inverse piezoelectric effect.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Advanced Biomaterials for Craniofacial Tissue Regeneration: From Fundamental Mechanism to Translational Applications-A Scoping Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Integrating BMSC-inlaid GelMA hydrogels and melatonin-loaded PLGA microspheres into silk fibroin/nanohydroxyapatite scaffolds to repair osteoporotic bone defects.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral-maxillofacial bone defects complicated by tumors, infections, or other bone diseases pose a significant clinical challenge. Traditional tissue-engineered bone substitute still has limitations regarding its three elements that resulting in unsatisfactory regeneration capability. Smart materials are a cutting-edge type of functional materials that can sense and respond to a wide range of environmental conditions or stimuli, including optical, electrical, magnetic, mechanical, thermal, and chemical signals. According to the type of stimulus to which the materials respond, they can be classified into externally stimulated materials and internally stimulated materials. This review, based on the latest advances in smart materials for bone defect repair, summarizes the different stimulus-responsive strategies of smart materials and the materials under each strategy. It also discusses the classic biomedical applications of these materials in the repair of oral-maxillofacial bone injuries in recent studies, compares the advantages and disadvantages of different strategies, and discusses the current challenges and future prospects of smart materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.