ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Culturally adapted exercise program for postmenopausal women with excess weight gain: A modified international/local Delphi study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous reports suggest that exercise intervention can reduce body weight and body composition profile parameters in obese postmenopausal women (PMW). Although some exercises have been constructed, international and local consensus on exercise programs for weight loss among postmenopausal women with excess weight (overweight and obesity) gain is lacking. We aimed to validate a culturally adapted exercise-based weight loss program for postmenopausal women using the Delphi consensus methodology. The study process consisted of three Delphi rounds among twelve international and twenty-one local experts. Participants were recruited via purposive sampling representing physiotherapists, exercise physiologists, exercise scientists, human kinetics and health education based on their interests and knowledge. A preliminary program was developed based on literature reviews and project findings. In the first Delphi round, open-ended responses were analysed thematically and converted into statements. Experts rated their agreement with these statements on a 5-point Likert scale in the second round. Consensus was defined as at least 60% strong agreement/disagreement. In the final round, participants reviewed the program and achieved an 80% consensus threshold. Thirty-three experts completed all three rounds, reaching consensus across four domains: health assessment, pre-exercise parameters, exercise dosage, and physician referrals. Response rates were high, with a final participation rate of 78% (n = 32).The high response rate established a strong consensus, providing clinicians with evidence-based recommendations to improve health outcomes for postmenopausal women in Ghana, with particular emphasis on the cultural adaptation process, especially the innovative inclusion of Ampe in the intervention.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.