Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40934200›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Does adoption of the rice-crayfish co-culture model improve farmers' income?

Xingjie Yang, Zhenhong Qi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xingjie YangCollege of Economics and Management, Zhejiang A & F University, Linan, Zhejinag, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4241-5218
Zhenhong QiCollege of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study empirically assesses the income effects of the rice-crayfish co-culture model using endogenous switching regression (ESR) and mediation models, based on survey data from 1,058 farm households in Hubei Province. Key findings reveal that adoption of the rice-crayfish co-culture model significantly boosts farmers' total income: counterfactual analysis shows non-adopters would experience a 22.423% decline in average household income if they ceased adoption. The adoption of the rice-crayfish co-culture model differential impacts on the income of various farmer groups. This divergence primarily stems from the model's significantly stronger positive effect on agricultural income compared to its minimal dampening effect on non-farm income. By examining the mechanism of its effect on farmers' income, we find that adopting the rice-crayfish co-culture model mainly promotes farmers' income by affecting the human capital of the family. Based on the above conclusions, the Chinese government should further promote the sustainable development of the rice-crayfish co-culture model and give full play to its role in increasing farmers' income. Simultaneously, constructing a comprehensive industrial system for the rice-crayfish co-culture model and intensifying technical training are imperative. These efforts aim to enhance the human capital of farmers, which in turn will effectively promote the growth of their income.

Indexed as

AgricultureFarmersIncomeOryzaAnimalsChinaFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID40934200
PMCPMC12425336

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.