ArticlePloS one2025
A retrospective cohort study evaluating the predictive value of urinary L-FABP combined with the SOFA score for assessing COVID-19 severity.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the symptoms of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) omicron strains are generally mild, some individuals with initially mild symptoms later required supplemental oxygen or hospitalization, while others died, highlighting the importance of rapid diagnosis and early treatment for such patients. Therefore, this study evaluated the benefit of a combined approach to identify individuals at risk of severe illness due to COVID-19 using urinary L-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) levels and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores calculated from blood tests for pre-admission screening of patients with COVID-19. L-FABP, a non-invasive urine biomarker, and the SOFA score, an established method for assessing organ failure severity, were evaluated in conjunction with patient data collected from 842 individuals admitted to a hospital in Tokyo, Japan. The combined approach demonstrated a higher accuracy in identifying patients at risk of severe illness compared to the L-FABP levels or SOFA scores alone. Thus, the results suggest that a two-tiered screening process, utilizing measurement of L-FABP levels as an initial rapid test, followed by SOFA score assessment for high-risk patients, results in efficient pre-admission screening and improved patient management. In conclusion, this study underscores the potential of combining L-FABP levels and SOFA scores for optimizing patient care during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing the need for further validation and refinement of the predictive models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.