ArticleEnvironment international2025
Cardiac electrophysiological responses to traffic pollution in adults with or without chronic cardiopulmonary diseases.
Article in Environment international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cardiorenal therapeutics in a polluted world: interpreting treatment benefit in an environmental context.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraffic pollution exposure has been associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, but determinants of individual susceptibility remain unclear. To explore whether disease status modifies traffic-related cardiac responses and to examine the cardioprotective role of nitro linoleic acids.
methodsIn a crossover study, 39 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, 38 ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients, and 39 healthy participants walked for two hours on traffic-congested Oxford Street and in traffic-free Hyde Park, in random order, on separate days. Cardiac electrical activity, including heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV), QT interval, and ST-segment changes, was continuously monitored for 24 h. At 24 h following the walk, a urine void was collected and analyzed for nitro linoleic acid NO
resultsIn reference to walking in the park, participants following the street walk exhibited adverse cardiac changes, including increased heart rate, decreased HRV, shortened QT interval, and elevated ST-segment, with larger changes in some parameters observed in COPD participants, though between-group differences were not statistically significant. Among COPD participants, the cardiac effects were more pronounced in those who did not use inhaler medications than in those who used them. NO
conclusionsAlthough between-group comparisons were not statistically significant, COPD patients showed numerically larger electrophysiological changes and reductions in NO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.