Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40935870›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Efficacy and safety of Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: an overview of systematic reviews and meta analyses.

Zhuang Wang, Na Wang, Xue Liang, Lina Wei, Yongfu Song, Dongze Li, Yongji Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhuang WangCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun City, Jilin Province, China.
Na WangCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun City, Jilin Province, China.
Xue LiangCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun City, Jilin Province, China.
Lina WeiDepartment of Pediatric Internal Medicine One, Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun City, Jilin Province, China.
Yongfu SongCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun City, Jilin Province, China.
Dongze LiCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun City, Jilin Province, China.
Yongji WangCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun City, Jilin Province, China. wangyjcczyy@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2297-584X

Funding

Jilin Provincial Key Research and Development Plan Project Jilin Provincial Key Research and Development Plan Project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionReappraisal of Systematic reviews/Meta analyses on Sublingual Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis: Evidence for Clinical Practice and Decision-Making.

methodsA comprehensive computerized search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, WANFANG, and CBM databases from their inception to June 8, 2025, to systematically identify Systematic reviews and Meta analyses on Sublingual Immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis. A citation overlap matrix was constructed to calculate the corrected covered area, assessing the degree of primary study overlap. The risk of bias, methodological quality, reporting quality, and certainty of evidence in the included Systematic reviews/Meta analyses were evaluated using ROBIS, AMSTAR-2, PRISMA 2020, and GRADE tools, respectively. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed on the primary outcomes to derive a more comprehensive and in-depth understanding.

resultsA total of 20 Systematic reviews/Meta analyses were included in this umbrella review. The corrected covered area of 6.391% derived from the citation matrix analysis indicated a modest degree of primary study overlap among the included literature. Risk of bias assessment demonstrated that all incorporated studies exhibited low bias risk. Methodological quality evaluation revealed 2 high-quality, 3 moderate-quality, 14 low-quality, and 1 extremely low-quality study. Reporting quality assessment yielded scores ranging from 22 to 41.5, with 7 studies classified as high-quality, 11 as moderate-quality, and 2 as low-quality reports. The evidence quality assessment revealed that among all evaluated outcomes, 7 were rated as high quality, 19 as moderate quality, 31 as low quality, and 14 as extremely low quality according to the GRADE framework. DISCUSSION: Current evidence demonstrates that Sublingual Immunotherapy exhibits favorable efficacy in improving symptom scores and medication use for allergic rhinitis, with generally acceptable safety profiles despite mild adverse reactions in some cases. Future research should focus on large-scale, real-world studies with diverse outcome measures, investigating variations in regional populations, allergen types, dosage regimens, and treatment durations to further optimize clinical application protocols for Sublingual Immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Rhinitis, AllergicSublingual ImmunotherapyHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicTreatment OutcomeAllergic rhinitisEfficacyOverview of systematic reviews and meta analysesSafetySublingual immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40935870
PMCPMC13002748

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.