Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40935898›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2025

Biomarkers of ageing of humans and non-human primates.

Zeming Wu, Jing Qu, Weiqi Zhang, Aging Biomarker Consortium, Guang-Hui Liu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A probioticGut microbes · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Total saponins fromJournal of ginseng research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zeming WuState Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8535-3427
Jing QuState Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. qujing@ioz.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3988-5067
Weiqi ZhangUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. zhangwq@big.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8885-5104
Aging Biomarker Consortium
Guang-Hui LiuState Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. ghliu@ioz.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9289-8177

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ageing is characterized by progressive functional decline and increase in disease risk and imposes substantial burdens on human health. Identifying aging biomarkers in primates is crucial for advancing our understanding of human ageing and for informing interventions to mitigate age-related pathologies. However, a comprehensive grasp of these biomarkers is still lacking, hindering the translation of fundamental research into clinical practice. In this Review, we present the current knowledge on biomarkers of ageing at the cellular, tissue and organism levels in humans and non-human primates. Through systematic analysis of representative biomarkers across diverse biological contexts and scales, we discuss both the variability and the conservation of ageing-associated physiological changes, underscoring their importance in assessing and intervening in the ageing process. Finally, we critically assess challenges in ageing research and outline strategic avenues for future investigation.

Indexed as

AgingBiomarkersPrimatesAnimalsHumansBiomarkers

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.