Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40935902›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2025

Guidelines for the use of economic evaluation to inform policies around access to treatment for kidney failure.

Siobhan Botwright, Panji Fortuna Hadisoemarto, Kinanti Khansa Chavarina, Aye Nandar Myint, Brandon Wen Bing Chua, Kridsada Chareonrungrueangchai, Chotika Suwanpanich, Pitsinee Supapol, Ijeoma Edoka, Valerie Luyckx and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Siobhan BotwrightHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand. siobhan.b@hitap.net.ORCID 0000-0002-8204-2065
Panji Fortuna HadisoemartoDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Kinanti Khansa Chavarina *Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Aye Nandar Myint *Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0006-7665-909X
Brandon Wen Bing Chua *Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9559-4205
Kridsada Chareonrungrueangchai *Bangkhla Hospital, Chachoengsao Provincial Public Health Office, Chachoengsao, Thailand.
Chotika SuwanpanichHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0000-8944-6225
Pitsinee SupapolHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Ijeoma EdokaHealth Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Valerie LuyckxThe Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7066-8135
Martin I MeltzerIndependent consultant, Atlanta, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7250-0472
Yot TeerawattananonHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2217-2930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kidney failure is the most advanced stage of chronic kidney disease, at which point patients require kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in the form of kidney transplant or lifelong dialysis to survive. Although many governments seek to provide KRT for patients with kidney failure under publicly funded health schemes, KRT requires considerable financial and human resources, which may need to be diverted from other health programmes. In deciding which KRT services to provide, to whom, and under which conditions, economic evaluation can show the trade-off between the cost and benefit of different policy options. This Guideline has been written for nephrologists, clinicians and policymakers, to build confidence in requesting, contributing towards, and using the results from economic evaluation studies. It is aimed at outlining the cases in which economic evaluation may support KRT policymaking and to lay out good practice for economic evaluation of KRT services. Recommendations cover the process of developing the policy and research questions, conducting the economic evaluation and interpreting results for policy.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityKidney Failure, ChronicRenal InsufficiencyRenal Replacement TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40935902

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.