Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40935920›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2025

Medullary Carcinoma of the Colon: Not as Favourable as Previously Thought?

Daniel Netto, Mugtaba Dafalla, Karim Muhammad, Haithum Tumeh, Chloe Sowerby, Konstantinos Kamposioras

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel NettoDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. d.netto@nhs.net.
Mugtaba DafallaDepartment of Pathology, Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, Stockport, UK.
Karim MuhammadDepartment of Surgery Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK.
Haithum TumehDepartment of Surgery Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK.
Chloe SowerbyDepartment of Surgery Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK.
Konstantinos KamposiorasDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. konstantinos.kamposioras@nhs.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedullary carcinoma of the colon (MCC) is a rare, evolving subtype of colorectal cancer that is histologically and clinically distinct from poorly differentiated and undifferentiated adenocarcinoma. Comprehensive meta-analyses show that MCCs predominantly have a mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) phenotype, which typically predicts a more favourable prognosis. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a unique case involving a male patient with an aggressive presentation of colon cancer. Histopathology supported a diagnosis of MCC, initially staged as T3N0M0. Shortly after resection, the patient presented with rapidly progressing metastatic disease involving brain and subcutaneous metastases and subsequent mortality.

conclusionMCC is an understudied subpopulation of colon cancers. Historically, the presence of MMRd in early-stage colon cancer predicts a favourable prognosis and also a lack of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Whether this also extrapolates to MCCs remains unclear, and as such, the case presented highlights the uncertainty in the current evidence base. Further research is warranted to help inform robust clinical management.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, MedullaryColonic NeoplasmsFatal OutcomeHumansMalePrognosisImmunochemical testMedullary carcinoma of the colonMismatch repair-deficient phenotype

Identifiers

PMID40935920
PMCPMC12426073

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.