ReviewNature reviews. Urology2026
Exploring promising biomarkers based on pathogenic mechanisms in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome.
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The urinary microbiome, overactive bladder and bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis - mechanisms, diagnostics and therapeutic opportunities.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Exploration and experimental validation of oxidative stress-related diagnostic genes in interstitial cystitis based on transcriptomics.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Molecular mechanism by which perfluorooctane sulfonate regulates the initiation and progression of prostate cancer via the ENTPD5-adenine axis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Redox Imbalance and NOS-Dependent Modulation of Superoxide in the Bladder Mucosa of Women With IC/BPS: A Preliminary Study.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Reply to 'Enhancing spatial transcriptomics in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma'.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), characterized by bladder discomfort and lower urinary tract symptoms, is often either overtreated or undertreated owing to the complexity and variability of symptoms and the lack of reliable diagnostic tools, leading to reduced quality of life and prolonged illness. The pathophysiology of IC/BPS remains unclear, with multiple hypotheses - such as autoimmune inflammation, oxidative stress and urothelial dysfunction - offering potential explanations. Consequently, a diverse range of urinary biomarkers has emerged, although their diagnostic reliability remains inconsistent. As technology advances, biomarkers are increasingly shifting towards multiplex assays, encompassing genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and cell-based methods; however, cutting-edge research and clinical validation are not yet integrated into the limited diagnostic tools available. Clinical phenotypes from the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain Research Network studies provide multi-level biomarker research - including molecular, imaging and other modalities - to support the diagnosis of IC/BPS. Integrating these observations will advance the development of precision medicine for the diagnosis of IC/BPS, thereby improving management of this complex condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40935927What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.