ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2025
Pharmaceutical compounds in marine ecosystems: ecotoxicological effects and risk assessment in phytoplankton and zooplankton.
Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmaceutical compounds (PCs) are one of the main classes of emerging contaminants, raising concern for their potential threat to the environment. Among them, acyclovir (ACV), carbamazepine (CBZ), diclofenac (DCF), and propranolol (PRP) are the most prescribed worldwide. However, their effects on the marine environment are still little known. In this study we assessed the ecotoxicological effects of these PCs in marine phyto- and zooplankton. In particular, growth and chlorophyll inhibition, mortality, development and behaviour were assessed in several species (Dunaliella tertiolecta, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Skeletonema pseudocostatum, Amphibalanus amphitrite, Paracentrotus lividus) after up to 72 h of exposure. Only high concentrations of any of the four PCs induced toxic effects at environmental levels. PRP was the most toxic PC towards both phyto- and zooplankton, followed by DCF, ACV, and CBZ. Environmental risk for all PCs could be estimated based on ecotoxicological responses, ranging from medium for ACV and CBZ, to high for DCF and PRP. In conclusion, all selected PCs may pose risk to marine phyto- and zooplankton. Hence, their presence and levels in the marine ecosystem should be further monitored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.