Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40936109›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Targeted Degradation of sGRP78 Alleviates the Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment.

Zhenghao Wu, Peng Zheng, Yunxiao Xiao, Qianheng Wang, Xin Pan, Xiaoqi Zhou, Yibing Lv, Junyi Xiao, Yong He, Tao Huang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Targeted Degradation of sGRP78 Alleviates the Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhenghao WuDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College and State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8468-1234
Peng ZhengDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College and State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Yunxiao XiaoDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College and State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Qianheng WangDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College and State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Xin PanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.
Xiaoqi ZhouDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College and State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Yibing LvDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College and State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Junyi XiaoDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College and State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Yong HeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.
Tao HuangDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2130-8621
Ping LeiDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College and State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6214-6775

Funding

Hubei Provincial Department of Science and Technology Key Innovation Program 2021BCA142National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871307National Natural Science Foundation of China 82303179National Natural Science Foundation of China 82372005Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province 2024AFB626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an urgent need for appropriate methods to identify patients who are sensitive to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for precise stratified treatment. Based on clinical proteomics screening and further validation in patient cohorts, we reported that soluble glucose-regulatory protein 78 (sGRP78) could be a serological biomarker to infer the poor chemotherapy response in breast cancer. Consequently, an "sGRP78 index" was established to accurately predict patient responses to NAT. When exploring the linked mechanisms on how sGRP78 confer the resistance, it was found that in high sGRP78 index tumors, there were more IL-10+/PD-L1+ B subsets and Tregs infiltration, accompanied by accelerated tumor progression and metastasis. The following experiment revealed that sGRP78 bound with tumor-infiltrating B cells, converting the latter into IL-10+/PD-L1+ ones, thereby promoting Treg formation and suppressing T cell-mediated antitumor cytotoxicity. By fusing the GRP78-selective protease subtilase cytotoxin catalytic A subunit (subA) with a nanobody against HER2, we achieved the targeted degradation of sGRP78 within the breast cancer region, effectively reversing the immunosuppressive microenvironment. Our findings highlight the potential of sGRP78 index as a predictive signature to identify patients' sensitivity to NAT, as well as the potential of sGRP78 as a novel immune checkpoint target for cancer therapy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPFemaleHeat-Shock ProteinsHumansInterleukin-10MiceBiomarkers, TumorEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPHeat-Shock ProteinsHSPA5 protein, humanHspa5 protein, mouseInterleukin-10breast cancerglucose‐regulated protein 78regulatory B cellstargeted protein degradationtumor immunity

Identifiers

PMID40936109
PMCPMC12677628

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.