ArticleAmerican journal of botany2025
The origin and diversification of Amaryllidaceae: A phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis.
Article in American journal of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The origin and diversification of Amaryllidaceae: A phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis.American journal of botany · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
premisePrevious angiosperm-wide studies estimated that the geophytic family Amaryllidaceae diverged in Africa 87.00-46.77 million years ago (mya), spanning the Cretaceous and Palaeogene periods, including multiple important climatic and geological events. Greater precision on when and where this divergence occurred is lacking due to limited sampling of Amaryllidaceae and the paucity of the monocot fossil record. A robust phylogeny is required to estimate the age and origin of suprageneric groups; however, the evolutionary relationships within Amaryllidaceae are unclear.
methodsWe used 78 plastome protein-coding genes to infer the phylogenetic relationships of Amaryllidaceae and estimated the age of the family using four fossils and five secondary calibration points from across the Asparagales. We conducted a new biogeographic analysis to determine the ancestral origins of Amaryllidaceae and suprageneric groups, providing insights into the drivers of diversification.
resultsOur phylogenetic analyses recovered Amaryllidaceae as monophyletic, with Agapanthoideae sister to Amaryllidoideae and Allioideae. We estimate that Amaryllidaceae diverged in southern Africa 48.6 mya (50.3-46.6 mya) during the early Eocene, a period of elevated global temperatures with increasing seasonal aridity. Our biogeographic analyses indicate that taxa migrated from Africa via the Arabian Peninsula to temperate Asia and beyond during the Miocene.
conclusionsThe comprehensive taxon sampling across Amaryllidaceae, the greater number of genes, and the placement of fossils has made it possible to substantially refine estimates of lineage divergence. Establishing a robust age estimate and reconstructing the biogeographic history has led to a better understanding of evolution within the family, of present-day distributions, and of possible drivers of diversification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.