Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40936414›Full record

ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2026

Programmable Compliance in Small-Diameter Vascular Grafts by Design of Melt-Electrowritten Scaffold Architectures for In Situ Tissue Engineering.

Kilian Maria Arthur Mueller, Christina Ahrens, Linda Grefen, Salma Mansi, Dario Arcuti, Elena De-Juan-Pardo, Felix Kur, Christian Hagl, Petra Mela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kilian Maria Arthur MuellerChair of Medical Materials and Implants, Department of Mechanical Engineering, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering (MIBE), Munich Institute of Integrated Materials, Energy and Process Engineering (MEP), Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0141-2467
Christina AhrensChair of Medical Materials and Implants, Department of Mechanical Engineering, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering (MIBE), Munich Institute of Integrated Materials, Energy and Process Engineering (MEP), Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Linda GrefenDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Salma MansiChair of Medical Materials and Implants, Department of Mechanical Engineering, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering (MIBE), Munich Institute of Integrated Materials, Energy and Process Engineering (MEP), Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Dario ArcutiChair of Medical Materials and Implants, Department of Mechanical Engineering, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering (MIBE), Munich Institute of Integrated Materials, Energy and Process Engineering (MEP), Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Elena De-Juan-PardoT3mPLATE, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre and University of Western Australia Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Felix KurDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Christian HaglDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Petra MelaChair of Medical Materials and Implants, Department of Mechanical Engineering, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering (MIBE), Munich Institute of Integrated Materials, Energy and Process Engineering (MEP), Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6503-076X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical practice, synthetic vascular grafts are advantageous due to their immediate availability but are burdened by high failure rates in small-diameter settings because of thrombogenicity, infections, and intimal hyperplasia (IH). A mismatch in compliance between graft and host vessel has been identified as a major contributor to the development of IH. Here, we propose a design strategy to fabricate polymeric small-diameter vascular graft scaffolds with programmable compliance based on a helical microfiber architecture via melt electrowriting (MEW). By controlling the fiber winding angle, this design strategy exploits, for the first time, the mechanical structure-function relationship of MEW scaffolds to enable tailored compliance covering the physiological range of arteries and veins. This concept is complemented by an integrated microporous MEW graft wall, potentially enabling in situ tissue engineering to combine the advantages of synthetic (off-the-shelf) and autologous (living) grafts. Leveraging this, a gradient is introduced in the fiber architecture to achieve arteriovenous grafts matching the compliance of the target vessels at their ends (arterial vs. venous compliance) with a continuous smooth transitional region in between. The potential for clinical translation is demonstrated in vitro by assessing suture-retention strength, anti-kinking properties, burst pressure, and cannulation behavior.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel ProsthesisTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsHumansaccess graftbiofabricationcompliancemelt electrowritingvascular graft

Identifiers

PMID40936414
PMCPMC12805616

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.