ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2026
Programmable Compliance in Small-Diameter Vascular Grafts by Design of Melt-Electrowritten Scaffold Architectures for In Situ Tissue Engineering.
Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart-responsive electrospun scaffolds (SRES) for neural repair: Recent advances and future prospects.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Revisiting the tension-free paradigm: Axially prestretched elastomeric nanofibrillar grafts restore artery-like axial biomechanics in a preclinical model.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Structural Motifs as Programmable Design Parameters for Tuning Vascular Mechanics in Fiber-Reinforced Hydrogel Grafts.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Programmable Compliance in Small-Diameter Vascular Grafts by Design of Melt-Electrowritten Scaffold Architectures for In Situ Tissue Engineering.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical practice, synthetic vascular grafts are advantageous due to their immediate availability but are burdened by high failure rates in small-diameter settings because of thrombogenicity, infections, and intimal hyperplasia (IH). A mismatch in compliance between graft and host vessel has been identified as a major contributor to the development of IH. Here, we propose a design strategy to fabricate polymeric small-diameter vascular graft scaffolds with programmable compliance based on a helical microfiber architecture via melt electrowriting (MEW). By controlling the fiber winding angle, this design strategy exploits, for the first time, the mechanical structure-function relationship of MEW scaffolds to enable tailored compliance covering the physiological range of arteries and veins. This concept is complemented by an integrated microporous MEW graft wall, potentially enabling in situ tissue engineering to combine the advantages of synthetic (off-the-shelf) and autologous (living) grafts. Leveraging this, a gradient is introduced in the fiber architecture to achieve arteriovenous grafts matching the compliance of the target vessels at their ends (arterial vs. venous compliance) with a continuous smooth transitional region in between. The potential for clinical translation is demonstrated in vitro by assessing suture-retention strength, anti-kinking properties, burst pressure, and cannulation behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.