ArticlePeerJ2025
Development of a prognostic RiskScore model using efferocytosis-related signature genes for lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) has high incidence and mortality rates. Efferocytosis is involved in the progression of various cancers. The current work set out to develop a prognosis signature using efferocytosis-related genes (ERGs) for LUAD. Methods: Public databases were accessed to obtain bulk and single-cell data of LUAD. Molecular subtyping of LUAD was performed using ConsensusClusterPlus, and efferocytosis-related candidate genes were screened by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) in combination with differential analysis. Subsequently, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was applied to construct a prognostic RiskScore model, followed by evaluating the relationship between the RiskScore, immune infiltration, and drug sensitivity. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of LUAD was performed with the Seurat package to elucidate the cellular origins of the key genes. The expression and potential function of the representative genes were verified by reverse transcriptional quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) (RT-qPCR), Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), wound healing, and Transwell assays. Results: Two molecular subtypes of LUAD with different outcomes and clinical features were identified. Candidate ERGs were mainly enriched in inflammatory and immune-related pathways. Subsequently, seven key genes ( Conclusions: Our results provided novel insights for the prognosis prediction and personalized treatment of LUAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.