ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Influence of an educational program utilizing VAK and Kolb's learning theories on basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge and practices among private home nurses in Qatar.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of a Visualization Training Platform on PICU Nurses' Pain Assessment Skill in Critically Ill Children: A Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial.Nursing open · 2026Trial
- Insights from a multinational survey on ERC courses: a cross-sectional analysis of participant and instructor perspectives.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Basic CPR is vital for home nurses, yet knowledge and practice gaps remain. Theory-based training can enhance skill effectiveness. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of VAK and Kolb's learning theories on basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge and practices among private home nurses in Qatar. Methods: Quasi-experimental pre-/post study. One-hundred-thirty-four nurses were randomized to VAK and Kolb group (each n = 67). A learning-style inventory, CPR knowledge questionnaire, basic life and automated external defibrillator checklists were completed at baseline, immediately post-training, and at 6 and 9 months. The intervention composed of multimodal training program combined a 1-h multimedia lecture incorporating case-based scenarios with a 3-h European Resuscitation Council four-stage workshop customized to cover all learning styles in both groups. Results: Participants were predominantly female (88.1 %), aged 35-44 years (44.8 %) and bachelor-prepared (59.7 %). Immediately after training, satisfactory CPR knowledge rose from 35 % to 90 %, BLS competence from 1.5 % to 100 % and AED operation from 23 % to 100 % (all p < 0.001). Retention fell sharply at 6 months (25.6 %, 25.6 % and 60.5 %, respectively) and only partly recovered by 9 months (53.3 %, 27.4 % and 71.4 %). Visual, auditory and concrete-experience learners showed the steepest decline, whereas kinesthetic and reflective-observer learners maintained the highest performance. Conclusion: Retention patterns differed sharply across learning styles. Visual, auditory, and concrete-experience nurses reached near-perfect scores right after training but lost much of those gains within six months. By nine months, kinesthetic (VAK) and reflective-observer (Kolb) learners still led CPR and AED performance, while visual, active-experimenter, and abstract-conceptualizer groups showed the steepest drop-offs. Sustained competence therefore hinges on both refresher timing and the cognitive-sensory mode through which skills were first acquired. Recommendations: Use VAK and Kolb profiling during initial competency checks to tailor refresher frequency (quarterly low-dose sessions for visual, auditory, and concrete learners; semi-annual for kinesthetic and reflective learners), conduct an annual full-skills audit, and assign a dedicated Resuscitation Officer to coordinate and monitor these activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.