ArticleTherapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism2025
Glucose interpretation meaning and action: enhancing type 1 diabetes decision-making with textual descriptions.
Article in Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal dataset on glucose interpretation, treatment decisions and smartwatch visualisation for type 1 diabetes.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Findings from our previous study indicate that people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) unknowingly misinterpret data displayed on glucose monitoring systems and make inaccurate treatment decisions, which increases the risk of hospitalisation. Objectives: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of incorporating textual descriptions in glucose monitoring systems compared to existing systems. The main goal is to minimise the effort required in glucose data interpretation, facilitating better self-management and ultimately improving haemoglobin A1C levels. Methods: A two-arm and mixed-methods evaluation was conducted. Participants were randomly allocated to the control arm (existing systems) or the experimental arm (newly developed systems incorporating textual descriptions). In the first part, a task-based usability assessment was conducted to compare performance between the two arms. The second part evaluated participant preferences, agreement with textual descriptions and perceptions of the new systems. Results: A total of 86 participants were recruited. The experimental arm achieved an 85.15% total correctness score, compared to 74.38% in the control arm ( Conclusion: Incorporating textual description into glucose monitoring systems enhances treatment decision-making for people with T1DM. It suggests that we are on the right path to helping them better understand their glucose data and assist their self-management. Extensive research is required to focus more on the patient-centred approach in information presentation and prioritise it in parallel with other advancements in glucose monitoring technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.