ReviewGastro hep advances2025
Evolution of Clinical Trials of Systemic Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Between 2005 and 2024: Based on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Review in Gastro hep advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the fundamental characteristics of clinical trials and changes over time in clinical trials of systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Interventional clinical trials of systemic therapies registered at ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2005 to December 2024 were downloaded. Data on recruitment status, clinical phase, therapy type, trial design, outcome indicators, and other relevant factors were evaluated. A total of 1233 trials were included, of which 363(29.4%) were registered from 2005 to 2014 and 870 (70.6%) were registered from 2015 to 2024, reflecting the growing body of research on HCC. Regarding the intervention model type, single-group designs were employed in 679 (55.1%) trials, and parallel designs were employed in 489 (39.7%). A total of 209 trials were Phase 1 (17.0%), 152 (12.3%) were phase 1|phase 2, 560 were phase 2 (45.4%), 41 (3.4%) were phase 2|phase 3, 162 (13.1%) were phase 3, and 32 (2.6%) were phase 4. Small-molecule targeted agents, immune monotherapies, and targeted agent and immunotherapy combinations were the primary interventions, being used in 364 (29.5%), 434 (35.2%), and 287 (23.3) studies, respectively. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly programmed death receptor 1 or programmed death ligand 1 antibodies, were the most studied immunotherapies. The development of systemic therapies for HCC have made significant progress in the past 2 decades, especially in the areas of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. The results of this study provide an important reference for the development of new HCC therapies and optimization of clinical trial design and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.