Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40937189›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2025

Atypical Psychosis in Parkinson Disease: A Retrospective Study on 24-Hour Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion of Foslevodopa/Foscarbidopa.

Lindun Ge, Yasuyoshi Kimura, Keita Kakuda, Kotaro Ogawa, Yuta Kajiyama, Kanako Asai, Seira Taniguchi, Goichi Beck, Yoshiyuki Nishio, Jee Hyun Kim and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Frailty in Parkinson's disease: time to integrate it into treatment decision-making?Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Cenesthopathy with tactile hallucinations induced by foslevodopa/foscarbidopa continuous subcutaneous infusion in advanced Parkinson's disease: a case report.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lindun GeDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2946-3494
Yasuyoshi KimuraDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9147-8058
Keita KakudaDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2563-5443
Kotaro OgawaDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2566-7675
Yuta KajiyamaDepartment of Neurology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7170-0758
Kanako AsaiDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7464-8912
Seira TaniguchiDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5297-7716
Goichi BeckDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8890-2743
Yoshiyuki NishioDepartment of Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, United Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University, Suita, Japan; and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6857-1200
Jee Hyun KimThe Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1299-4300
Kensuke IkenakaDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5559-1966
Hideki MochizukiDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0874-7542

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Atypical psychosis, characterized by severe delusions, paranoia, and auditory or somatic hallucinations, is a notable complication of continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa therapy in Parkinson disease (PD). The aim of this study was to identify clinical predictors of CSCI-induced psychosis to understand its potential mechanisms and evaluate predictive measures for early detection and management. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with PD treated with CSCI (n = 23) and an independent PD database cohort (n = 94) from Osaka University Hospital. In the CSCI cohort, clinical data such as psychosis information and answers from Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ39) and the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease-Current Symptoms (QUIP-CS) were collected. Statistical analyses included independent Results: Among the 23 patients, 6 developed atypical psychosis, all occurring within 6 months, with 4 of them discontinuing CSCI. Patients who developed atypical psychosis had significantly higher QUIP-CS scores before CSCI (adjusted Discussion: CSCI-induced psychosis is distinct from visual hallucinations observed in typical PD psychosis and likely involves mechanisms in mesolimbic circuits and impulsive-compulsive behaviors associated with dopamine dysregulation. While QUIP-CS is rarely used in clinical practice, widely used PDQ39_sub5 offers a practical way to identify individual psychosis risk. These findings potentially offer tailored strategies to predict and manage atypical psychosis in patients with PD receiving advanced dopaminergic therapies.

Identifiers

PMID40937189
PMCPMC12421908

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.