Evidence mapPaperPMID 40937212Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Novel Biomarkers and Advanced Imaging in Cardiovascular Risk Stratification for Rheumatic Diseases.

Freya H Shah, Siddharth Agrawal, Ritu C Tated, Darshilkumar Maheta, Syed Naqvi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Freya H ShahInternal Medicine, Landmark Medical Center, Woonsocket, USA.
Siddharth AgrawalInternal Medicine, Landmark Medical Center, Woonsocket, USA.
Ritu C TatedPublic Health, New York Medical College, Valhalla, USA.
Darshilkumar MahetaPublic Health, New York Medical College, Valhalla, USA.
Syed NaqviInternal Medicine, Landmark Medical Center, Woonsocket, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rheumatic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), significantly increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), with affected patients exhibiting a 2-3-fold higher risk compared to the general population. This elevated risk is primarily driven by chronic inflammation and accelerated atherosclerosis, which are not fully captured by traditional cardiovascular risk calculators. RA patients face cardiovascular risks similar to those of type 2 diabetics, while SLE patients, particularly young women, have a dramatically increased risk of myocardial infarction. These conditions challenge the conventional understanding of CVD risk, as traditional factors like hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking do not fully account for the excess risk observed. This has led to growing interest in the use of new biomarkers and advanced imaging technologies to improve risk stratification and early detection of cardiovascular involvement. This review examines the pathophysiological mechanisms that link rheumatic diseases with cardiovascular risk. Chronic inflammation, immune dysregulation, and vascular dysfunction are central to the accelerated atherosclerosis and myocardial damage seen in RA and SLE. Key proinflammatory cytokines, including Tumor Necrosis Factor- Alpha (TNF-α), Interleukin (IL) IL-6, and IL-17, contribute to endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress, exacerbating cardiovascular risk. In addition, biomarkers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), NT-proBNP, and troponins are valuable for detecting subclinical cardiac involvement and predicting adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Emerging biomarkers like IL-32, Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK-1), and galectin-3 also show potential in further refining risk assessment, particularly for atherosclerosis and myocardial fibrosis in rheumatic diseases. Advanced imaging methods, such as transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), carotid ultrasonography, cardiac MRI (CMR), and coronary CT angiography (CCTA), provide key insights into subclinical cardiovascular changes in rheumatic disease patients. These techniques enable the detection of myocardial inflammation, fibrosis, and early atherosclerosis, helping guide clinical decisions and preventive interventions. Despite advancements, traditional cardiovascular risk calculators often underestimate CVD risk in rheumatic disease patients, leading to the use of adjusted models, such as EULAR-endorsed 1.5× risk multiplier for RA patients. These adjustments, along with the integration of biomarkers and imaging findings, can help identify high-risk individuals and prompt early interventions, such as statin therapy. However, challenges remain, including the cost and accessibility of some imaging methods, the heterogeneous risk profiles across different rheumatic diseases, and the need for more prospective trials to evaluate the effectiveness of biomarkers and imaging in clinical practice. In conclusion, incorporating biomarkers and advanced imaging techniques into cardiovascular risk assessment provides a more accurate method for managing CVD in rheumatic disease patients. These approaches allow for more personalized care, helping reduce the increased CVD mortality seen in this population. Future research should focus on refining multi-biomarker algorithms, improving imaging technology, and conducting intervention trials to optimize cardiovascular outcomes in rheumatic disease patients.

Indexed as

ct scan and advance imaginginflammationnovel biomarkersrheumatic disorderrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID40937212
PMCPMC12421942

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.