Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40937219›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Implementing Robotic Gynecologic Surgery: Early Outcomes From a Tertiary Care Hospital in Portugal.

Andreia Martins, Sara Moreira, Filipa Alpendre, Paula Ambrósio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andreia MartinsGynecology, Unidade Local de Saúde de São José, Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa, Lisboa, PRT.
Sara MoreiraGynecology, Unidade Local de Saúde de São José, Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa, Lisboa, PRT.
Filipa AlpendreGynecologic Oncology, Unidade Local de Saúde de São José, Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa, Lisboa, PRT.
Paula AmbrósioGynecologic Oncology, Unidade Local de Saúde de São José, Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa, Lisboa, PRT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Robotic surgery is increasingly used in minimally invasive gynecologic procedures. In Portugal, its integration into the National Health Service is still recent. This study presents the early clinical experience of a Portuguese tertiary center with robot-assisted gynecologic surgery. Materials and methods This was a retrospective, observational, and descriptive study based on the analysis of clinical charts from patients who underwent robot-assisted gynecologic surgery between October 2022 and December 2024. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were evaluated, as well as histopathological results. Results A total of 109 patients underwent robot-assisted gynecologic surgery during the study period. The median patient age was 55 years, and the median BMI was 26.6 kg/m². The main surgical indication was adnexal tumor in 46 patients (42.2%), followed by endometrial tumor or its precursors in 33 patients (30.3%). The most commonly performed procedure was total hysterectomy (69.7%). The median operative time was 193 minutes, and estimated blood loss was less than 100 mL in most cases (66.1%). The conversion rate to laparotomy was 0.9%, and the median length of hospital stay was one day. Complications occurred in 10.1% of patients, most of which were Clavien-Dindo grade I or II. The readmission rate was 2.8%. Conclusion The implementation of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery in our center was associated with favorable short-term outcomes, including low complication and readmission rates, minimal blood loss, and rapid recovery. While limited to a single-center experience, this study adds to the growing evidence on the safe and feasible introduction of robotic surgery in gynecologic practice.

Indexed as

gynecologyhysterectomyminimally invasive surgeryrobotic surgerysurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40937219
PMCPMC12422166

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.