ReviewCureus2025
Evaluating Treatment Options for Opiate Use Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Buprenorphine-Naloxone and Extended-Release Naltrexone.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a chronic, relapsing condition with significant health and social consequences. Buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) and extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) are two primary medications used for OUD treatment. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BUP-NX and XR-NTX for OUD treatment. Studies were included based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, including patient population, intervention, comparator, outcome measures, and study design. Pooled analyses were performed to assess differences in abstinence time, days of opioid use, negative urine samples, quality of life, and adverse effects. No significant difference was found between BUP-NX and XR-NTX in terms of abstinence time. However, XR-NTX demonstrated a significant advantage in reducing the number of days of opioid use. No significant differences were observed in terms of the number of negative urine samples or quality of life. Adverse effects were comparable between the two treatments. While both medications appear effective for OUD treatment, the choice between BUP-NX and XR-NTX may depend on individual patient factors. Further research is needed to clarify the long-term effects of these medications and to identify optimal treatment strategies for different patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.