Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40937240›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Rethinking Medical Education Through Connection: A Narrative Review of Cultivating Collaborative Intelligence for Sustainable Healthcare.

Nobuyasu Komasawa, Masanao Yokohira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nobuyasu KomasawaCommunity Medicine Education Promotion Office, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Miki-cho, JPN.
Masanao YokohiraDepartment of Medical Education, Kagawa University, Miki-cho, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern healthcare faces unprecedented complexity, driven by aging populations, chronic diseases, global health threats, and widening health disparities. These challenges are deeply embedded in social, institutional, and environmental systems, demanding a shift from isolated clinical practice to dynamic, multi-layered collaboration. Yet, current medical education, both in Japan and globally, often underprepares learners for the relational, interprofessional, and systemic demands of real-world healthcare. This narrative review explores how medical education must be reimagined to cultivate "collaborative intelligence," the ability to engage across disciplinary, generational, institutional, and community boundaries. Drawing on educational theories such as Vygotsky's social constructivism, we advocate for a connection-centered, practice-oriented curriculum that embeds relational learning across all stages of training. Through redesigned clinical clerkships, interprofessional simulations, community-based rotations, and structured mentorship, students can develop not only communication and teamwork skills but also the ethical reasoning and adaptive leadership required in complex care environments. We also examine structural barriers, including institutional silos, hierarchical cultures, and outdated assessment systems, that continue to impede meaningful collaboration. We argue that embedding connection into the core of medical education is both a pedagogical necessity and a moral imperative. Ultimately, the goal is not only to adapt to the complexity of healthcare systems but also to empower future professionals to transform them toward resilience, equity, and human-centered care. In doing so, medical education can become a catalyst for sustainable health systems and inclusive communities.

Indexed as

collaborative intelligenceconnection-centered educationinterprofessional educationmedical education reformsustainable healthcare

Identifiers

PMID40937240
PMCPMC12421342

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.