ArticleFrontiers in nephrology2025
Fuzzy logic nursing tool for early acute kidney injury detection in surgical patients.
Article in Frontiers in nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a common yet preventable complication among surgical patients, contributing to increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. Early detection is critical; however, the absence of a standardized nursing-led risk assessment tool for AKI limits proactive intervention in clinical practice. Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate the Nursing Risk Assessment for Acute Kidney Injury tool, integrating the Fuzzy Logic Model (FLM) to enhance interpretive accuracy and improve nursing-led AKI risk detection and decision-making. Methods: A Design and Development Research (DDR) framework was employed in three phases. Phase 1 involved a needs analysis using a focus group discussion to explore the necessity of AKI assessment among surgical nurses. Phase 2 focused on tool development through expert consensus (surgeon, nephrologist, nursing academician, and experienced nurse) and evidence synthesis via a systematic literature review. In Phase 3, the Nursing Risk Assessment-AKI tool was evaluated through a quasi-experimental design at Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz (HCTM), Kuala Lumpur, involving 75 surgical nurses assessing 200 patients. Results: Post-intervention analysis indicated increased nursing confidence, with 95.7% expressing positive perception of tool use. The FLM-supported tool demonstrated a predictive accuracy of 81.3%; however, the potential for false positives or negatives remains, especially given the single-center context. Fuzzy logic stratified patients into risk groups: at risk (33.5%), borderline (20.5%), and no risk (46.0%). ANOVA analysis revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) between AKI risk and factors such as age, gender, comorbidities, clinical/laboratory parameters, surgery types, and nephrotoxic agent usage. Conclusion: While initial findings support the usability and clinical feasibility of the NURA-AKI tool, further multicenter validation is needed. The tool is designed to complement nurse judgment, promoting early AKI detection and structured risk communication in surgical care without replacing clinical autonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.