ArticleAdvances in therapy2025
Assessing the Benefits of Rapid Start Antiretroviral Therapy for Newly Diagnosed People with HIV in the United States.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hematological Profile and Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Patients with HIV: A 12-Month Single-Centre Cohort Study.Viruses · 2026Article
- Modeling the Public Health Impact of Improved Antiretroviral Therapy Restart Patterns Among People with HIV Who Have Discontinued Treatment.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2026Article
- The HIV Epidemic in the United States - Epidemiological Projections and Public Economic Impact of Achieving Zero Transmission Goals.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInternational guidelines emphasize the need for earlier commencement of antiretroviral therapy (ART) among people with HIV (PWH). Reducing the time between HIV diagnosis and ART initiation can improve health outcomes, reduce healthcare utilization, and reduce HIV transmissions. This study evaluated the clinical and economic benefits associated with increasing uptake of rapid start ART among newly diagnosed PWH.
methodsA state transition disease model was developed in the United States setting to evaluate the benefits from earlier initiation of ART. The base case analysis compared two cohorts of 1000 newly diagnosed PWH: one following current patterns of ART initiation, and a counterfactual cohort where those receiving rapid start ART was doubled. Individuals were classified by different CD4 states at diagnosis and over time with viral suppression rates also being tracked. ART and CD4 state-specific healthcare costs were estimated over a 3-year time horizon. Averted HIV transmissions were calculated and used to estimate lifetime healthcare cost savings while CD4-specific mortality was also calculated. Several scenario analyses explored alternate assumptions related to the time at which PWH started ART after diagnosis.
resultsDoubling the proportion of newly diagnosed PWH receiving rapid start ART averted 7 HIV transmissions and 0.3 deaths per 1000 people, corresponding to numbers needed to treat of 141 and 3502, respectively. This leads to cost savings resulting from reduced healthcare resource use and lifetime cost savings from preventing new HIV transmissions.
conclusionReducing the time between HIV diagnosis and ART initiation can provide clinical and economic benefits by eliminating transmissions that might occur while individuals are viremic but not on treatment. The additional costs of providing ART required for this increase achieve high levels of return when considering the lifetime healthcare cost burden of onward HIV transmissions potentially averted by early ART start.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.