Evidence mapPaperPMID 40938542Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025

Optimising end-of-life geriatric pharmacotherapy: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study of deprescribing early in the care trajectory before hospice transition.

Tahani Alwidyan, Carole Parsons, Abdelrahim Alqudah, Abdel-Ellah Al-Shudifat, Abdel-Rahman N Al-Lozi, Muna Riziq Khader

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tahani AlwidyanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Hashemite University, Damascus Hwy Road, P.O. Box 330127, Zarqa, 13133, Jordan. alwidyantahani@hu.edu.jo.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9543-0825
Carole ParsonsSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Abdelrahim AlqudahDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Hashemite University, Damascus Hwy Road, P.O. Box 330127, Zarqa, 13133, Jordan.
Abdel-Ellah Al-ShudifatDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dermatology, Neurology and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Abdel-Rahman N Al-LoziDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Hashemite University, Damascus Hwy Road, P.O. Box 330127, Zarqa, 13133, Jordan.
Muna Riziq KhaderDepartment of Internal Medicine and Family Medicine, Prince Hamza Hospital, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPolypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are common among terminally ill older people and often persist until death, undermining comfort-focused care. While deprescribing is an effective strategy to optimise medicines use at the end of life, its timing is crucial. Delaying deprescribing until after hospice admission may diminish opportunities for comprehensive medication review during hospital-based care, when a full multidisciplinary team (MDT) and complete clinical records are available. Timely deprescribing during the final days of hospital-based care before hospice transition may better align pharmacotherapy with end-of-life goals and facilitate transition.

aimThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of an MDT-led intervention delivered during the final days of hospital-based care before hospice transition on medication burden, PIM use, and symptom control prescribing.

methodThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at a Jordanian tertiary hospital. Patients aged ≥ 65 years with life-limiting illnesses who were transitioned to hospice care between January and December 2022 were included. Medication data were extracted at baseline (seven days before MDT review) and post-intervention (in the final 24 h of hospital-based care). Deprescribing was categorised as proactive (planned discontinuation to prevent future harm) or reactive (triggered by an immediate clinical issue). Medication appropriateness was assessed using STOPPFrail version 2. Regimen complexity was evaluated using the Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI).

resultsAmong 165 patients, polypharmacy (use of ≥ five medications) prevalence declined from 63.0% to 14.5% (P < 0.001), and the proportion receiving ≥ one PIM decreased from 91.6% to 34.0% (P < 0.001). The mean number of chronic medications declined by 4.5 (± 3.2), and MRCI scores decreased by 4.8 points (P < 0.001). Of 736 medications discontinued, 65.9% were proactively deprescribed. Use of symptom control medications, particularly opioids, increased significantly (from 5 to 64 prescriptions; P < 0.001). Regression analysis identified baseline polypharmacy, high MRCI, and dyslipidaemia as predictors of greater PIM reduction.

conclusionMDT-led deprescribing, implemented during the final days of hospital-based care before hospice transition, was associated with reduced medication burden and PIM use, alongside increased symptom-focused prescribing. These findings support the integration of structured, proactive deprescribing into hospital-based care to improve medication safety, enhance patient comfort, and facilitate continuity across care settings.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsHospice CareTerminal CareAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingJordanMalePatient Care TeamPolypharmacyPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListRetrospective StudiesCare transitionsDeprescribingEnd-of-life careMultidisciplinary teamOlder peoplePolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID40938542

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.