Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40938833›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

How do college coaches in the United States identify youth female and male soccer players?

Matthew Andrew, Sam Barraclough, Andrew O Triggs, James H Dugdale, Adam Kelly, Matthew J Reeves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew AndrewDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University Institute of Sport, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2007-910X
Sam BarracloughDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University Institute of Sport, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8584-6408
Andrew O TriggsUCFB Manchester Campus, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2431-5633
James H DugdaleSchool of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Adam KellyFaculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Matthew J ReevesResearch Centre for Applied Sport, Physical Activity & Performance, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3903-2910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Talent identification (TI) in soccer is a complex and multifactorial process within the context of collegiate sport in the United States, where coaches must assess performance-ready athletes often under strict regulatory and resource constraints. Despite the critical role college coaches play in bridging youth to professional soccer, little is known about their evaluative priorities during recruitment. This study examined how soccer coaches from female and male NCAA Division I and II programs perceived the importance of various player attributes and scouting methods in the TI process. A total of 178 college soccer coaches completed a survey assessing perceptions across seven attribute categories (technical, physical, psychological, game intelligence, social, other, and coach-specific) and common scouting methods. Bootstrapped trimmed means, effect sizes, and inter-rater agreement (rwg) were used to analyse the coaches' ratings of importance across attributes and to assess for differences in coach perceptions within the female and male programs. Results showed coaches across female and male programs rated technical proficiency, coachability, decision-making, and work rate as critically important. College-specific soccer knowledge was the most highly valued coach attribute, while live match observation was the most preferred scouting method. Sex-based differences were generally minimal, although emerged in perceptions of physical and social attributes, with coaches of female players placing greater emphasis on communication and agility. Results highlighted a shared prioritisation of technical and psychological qualities in college TI, with contextual differences influenced by sex and program structure. These insights support the development of more aligned and evidence-informed TI strategies in collegiate soccer environments.

Indexed as

AptitudeAthletesAthletic PerformanceMentoringSoccerAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40938833
PMCPMC12431234

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.