Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40938834›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

It's not difficulty that matters, but strategy: Perceived stressor, functional and dysfunctional coping strategies in ultra-trails of extreme duration.

Pietro Trabucchi, Barbara Pellegrini, Aldo Savoldelli, Gianandrea Giacoma, Ilaria Vergine, Carlo Galimberti, Sara Garofalo, Federico Schena

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pietro TrabucchiCERISM, Centro Ricerca Interuniversitario Sport Montagna e Salute, Rovereto, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2483-0056
Barbara PellegriniCERISM, Centro Ricerca Interuniversitario Sport Montagna e Salute, Rovereto, Italy.
Aldo SavoldelliCERISM, Centro Ricerca Interuniversitario Sport Montagna e Salute, Rovereto, Italy.
Gianandrea GiacomaResearch Center in Communication Psychology (PsiCom), Università Cattolica, Milan, Italy.
Ilaria VergineIndependent researcher, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0921-1045
Carlo GalimbertiIndependent researcher, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7332-3332
Sara GarofaloDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Federico SchenaCERISM, Centro Ricerca Interuniversitario Sport Montagna e Salute, Rovereto, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, no studies have proposed specific taxonomies of stressors and coping strategies used to manage them by ultra trail runners in races longer than 200 miles, with existing research focusing on significantly shorter distances an then on challenges that could be of a different nature. The aim of this study was to fill this gap by developing specific taxonomies that would group both the stressors encountered and the coping strategies into distinct conceptual categories. Furthermore, to observe in a real competition if these taxonomies allows the evaluation of the coping strategies used by athletes. Two Focus Groups composed of experts on the topic proposed provisional classifications, which were analysed using Applied Thematic Analysis. Three distinct Draft Taxonomies were identified: typical stressors, functional and dysfunctional coping strategies used by athletes during competitions. A critical comparison between the provisional taxonomies and literature led to the development of three definitive taxonomies. In a second phase, to verify whether the taxonomies reflected the real experiences of runners, seven participants in a 280-mile race were interviewed daily during the event. Their responses regarding the stressors and the strategies they had implemented to deal with them were recorded. Expert panelists categorized the transcribed responses according to the proposed taxonomies. The concordance of the judgments, verified with the Fleiss K, was considered a measure of the taxonomies' ability to capture real experiences. Results confirmed substantial agreement between the raters regarding both the stressors (K = 0.711, p < 0.001) and the coping strategies (K = 0.73, p < 0.001). The analysis of the proportion between the use of functional and dysfunctional strategies proved to be high (between 0.66 and 1) among athletes who completed more than 50% of the race. The taxonomies were found to effectively described athletes' race experiences, revealing context-specific coping strategies likely developed through years of practice.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAthletesRunningStress, PsychologicalAdultCoping SkillsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID40938834
PMCPMC12431310

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.