ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2025
Using Bayesian Networks to Predict Urgent Care Visits in Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePatients receiving systemic therapy (ST) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience toxicities that negatively affect patient outcomes. This study aimed to test an approach for prospectively collecting patient-reported outcome (PRO) data, wearable sensor data (WSD), and clinical data, and develop a machine learning (ML) algorithm to predict health care utilization, specifically urgent care (UC) visits. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with NSCLC completed the PROMIS-57 PRO quality-of-life measure and wore a Fitbit to monitor patient-generated health data from ST initiation through day 60. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from the medical record. ML explainable models on the basis of Bayesian Networks (BNs) were used to develop predictive models for UC visits.
resultsPatients in the training data set (N = 58) were age 69 years on average (range, 35-89) and mostly female (57%), White (88%), and non-Hispanic (95%) patients with adenocarcinoma (69%). Initial BN models trained on demographic and clinical data demonstrated moderate predictive accuracy on cross-validation for UC visits before ST (AUC, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.80]) and during ST (AUC, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89]). Incorporating PRO and WSD during ST yielded enhanced models with significantly improved performance (final AUC, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76 to 0.95]) via DeLong test (
conclusionMultidimensional data sources, including demographic, clinical, PRO, and WSD, can enhance ML predictive models to elucidate complex, interactive factors influencing health care utilization during the first 60 days of ST. Use of explainable ML to predict and prevent treatment toxicities and health care utilization could improve patient outcomes and enhance the quality of cancer care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.