ArticleJMIR cardio2025
Long-Term Feasibility and Outcomes of a Digital Health Program to Improve Liver Fat and Cardiometabolic Markers in Individuals With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Prospective Single-Arm Feasibility Study.
Article in JMIR cardio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Attrition in Digital Self-Management Interventions for Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): Mixed Methods Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Therapeutic Effects of a WeChat Mini-Program on Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A 12-week digital health program for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) previously showed feasibility in engagement, program retention, and clinical outcomes. This study investigates whether improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors achieved during a 12-week active program were sustained over a subsequent 6-month follow-up period. Objective: The primary objective of this analysis was to evaluate whether the clinical improvements achieved after a 12-week program were maintained over the subsequent 6-month period, which did not include coaching or new intervention materials. In addition, the study aimed to assess participants' retention and engagement with the maintenance program. Methods: In a 9-month, single-arm study using the Sidekick app (Sidekick Health), individuals with NAFLD and BMI >30 or metabolic syndrome or type 2 diabetes were included. The initial 12 weeks focused on providing education about diet, physical activity, stress management, and sleep, followed by 6 months without coaching or new intervention materials. The measured outcomes encompassed demographics, body composition, liver fat assessed using magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), and blood markers. Results: Of the 34 participants who completed the first 12 weeks, 28 (82%) completed the 9-month study measurements. The median age was 63.0 years (IQR 53.5-71.0) and 57.1% (16/28) were women. At 9 months, compared to baseline, the mean weight loss was 4.0 kg (SD 5.0; P<.001). Liver fat decreased by 2.5% (SD 4.5; P<.001), with an 18.4% relative reduction. Systolic blood pressure decreased by 8.3 mm Hg (SD 13.4, P<.001) and diastolic by 2.5 mm Hg (SD 6.0; P=.02). Waist circumference decreased by 4.7 cm (SD 7.1; P<.001) and median glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decreased by 19.5 mmol/mol (P<.001). Conclusions: Sustained improvements in liver fat and metabolic markers suggest that Sidekick Health's digital program is a promising strategy for managing NAFLD without requiring continuous coaching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.