ArticleJMIR human factors2025
Designing Digital Mental Health Support for Paramedics Exposed to Trauma: Qualitative Study of Lived Experiences and Design Preferences.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organisational readiness and preparedness for trauma-informed practice across UK frontline services: a mixed-methods study.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Article
- Persistent Traumatic Stress Exposure: Rethinking PTSD for Frontline Workers.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Paramedics face frequent exposure to trauma and intense occupational stress, often under conditions of limited psychological support and ongoing stigma. Digital mental health interventions have the potential to offer accessible, confidential, and tailored support. However, their acceptability and design must be informed by the lived experiences of paramedics to ensure effectiveness. Objective: This study aimed to explore the experiences of trauma exposure among UK paramedics in the workplace and their views on the design and delivery of digital mental health interventions. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 UK paramedics. Participants were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Ethical approval was obtained, and trauma-informed principles were applied throughout data collection and analysis. Results: Five key themes were identified: (1) It Has to Feel Easy to Use: highlighting the need for digital tools that reduce cognitive burden and are accessible during unpredictable shifts; (2) Make It Fit My Needs: calling for interventions specifically designed for paramedics, with lived-experience-informed language and delivery; (3) We Need to Talk to Each Other: describing a strong desire for peer connection while recognizing barriers such as stigma and shift pressures; (4) I Need to Know It's Safe: emphasizes the importance of anonymity, data privacy, and psychological safety; and (5) Support Needs to Feel Human: reinforcing the value of integrating digital tools with human connection and professional services. Participants expressed strong support for an app-based solution that offers anonymity, rapid accessibility, and flexibility, while preserving opportunities for human interaction. Conclusions: Paramedics face unique mental health challenges that are not adequately addressed by existing services. Digital mental health tools offer promise if they are carefully co-designed to reflect the realities of frontline work. Anonymity, usability, peer connection, and integration with existing support systems are critical to engagement. These findings offer actionable insights for the development of trauma-informed, context-sensitive digital mental health interventions for emergency service workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.