Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40940063›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2025

Two years and counting: a prospective cohort study on the scope and severity of post-COVID symptoms across diverse patient groups in the Netherlands-insights from the CORFU study.

Dorthe O Klein, Sophie F Waardenburg, Emma B N J Janssen, Marieke S J N Wintjens, Maike Imkamp, Stella C M Heemskerk, Erwin Birnie, Gouke J Bonsel, Michiel C Warlé, Lotte M C Jacobs and 19 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05240742 (Persistent Complaints After COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05240742 completednot on this map

Persistent Complaints After COVID-19: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Prediction, and Communication, the CORona Follow Up (CORFU) Study

TypeobservationalSponsorMaastricht University Medical CenterRan2021 to 2024Enrolled4,291ConditionsCOVID-19, Long COVID, Post COVID-19 ConditionArmsno intervention, the CORFU study conducts analyses based on data which has been prospectively collected (and aggregated when possible) in 7 existing cohorts
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Psychometric validation of a cognition and social participation bolt-on for the EQ-5D-5L in SARS-CoV-2 infected German healthcare workers.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Dorthe O KleinDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands dorthe.klein@mumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0182-9569
Sophie F WaardenburgDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8077-7877
Emma B N J JanssenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marieke S J N WintjensDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maike ImkampDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Stella C M HeemskerkDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erwin BirnieEuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gouke J BonselEuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Michiel C WarléDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lotte M C JacobsDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bea HemmenCare and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI) Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jeanine VerbuntCare and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI) Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bas C T van BusselCare and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI) Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1621-7848
Susanne van SantenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bas L J H KietelaerCardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Gwyneth JansenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Frederikus A KlokDepartment of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Martijn D de KruifDepartment of Pulmonology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Kevin VernooyCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM) Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Juanita A HaagsmaDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Folkert W AsselbergsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marijke LinschotenDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jochen W L CalsDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9550-5674
Hugo Ten CateCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM) Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2799-2491
Iwan C C van der HorstCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM) Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3891-8522
Nick WilmesCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM) Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
CAPACITY-COVID Collaborative Consortium
Chahinda Ghossein-Doha *Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM) Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sander M J van Kuijk *Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2796-729X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceLittle research has been done on post-COVID symptoms at 24 months postinfection and on the association these may have on health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

objectiveWe assessed the prevalence and severity of post-COVID symptoms and quantified EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), self-perceived health question (EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)) and health utility scores (HUS) up to 24 months follow-up.

designThe longitudinal multiple cohort CORona Follow-Up (CORFU) study combines seven COVID-19 patient cohorts and a survey among the general public. The participants received questionnaires on several time points. Participants were stratified by: without a known SARS-CoV-2 infection (control group), proven SARS-CoV-2 infection but non-hospitalised, proven SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalised to the ward, and proven SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalised to the intensive care unit (ICU).

settingIn this study, data of seven COVID-19 patient cohorts and a survey among the general public are included.

participantsFormer COVID-19 patients and controls participated in this cohort study. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Former COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 controls were sent questionnaires on symptoms associated with post-COVID condition. The CORFU questionnaire included 14 symptom questions on post-COVID condition using a five-level Likert-scale format. Furthermore, HRQOL was quantified using the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire: EQ-VAS and the EQ-5D-5L utility score. The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire includes five domains that are scored on a five-point Likert scale: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.

resultsA total of 901 participants (and 434 controls) responded at 24 months follow-up. In all former COVID-19 patients, the presence of post-COVID condition at 24 months was observed in 62 (42.5%, 95% CI 34.3% to 50.9%) of the non-hospitalised patients, 333 (65.0%, 95% CI 60.7% to 69.2%) of the hospitalised ward patients and 156 (63.2%, 95% CI 56.8% to 69.2%) of the ICU patients, respectively (p<0.001). The most common symptoms included fatigue, sleep problems, muscle weakness/pain and breathing issues, with hospitalised participants reporting most often having symptoms. Multiple post-COVID symptoms were significantly associated with EQ-5D-5L measures. The mean and SD of the EQ-VAS were 71.6 (17.9), 70.0 (17.3) and 71.4 (17.5) for non-hospitalised, ward and ICU participants, respectively, and 75.6 (17.7) for the controls (p<0.001). The HUS resulted in 0.81 (0.20), 0.77 (0.19) and 0.79 (0.22) for non-hospitalised, hospitalised ward and ICU participants, respectively, and 0.84 (0.19) for the control group (CG) (p<0.001).

conclusionsMany former COVID-19 patients experience post-COVID symptoms at 24 months follow-up, with the highest prevalence in hospitalised participants. Also, former patients reported a lower HRQOL. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The CORFU study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (registration number NCT05240742).

Indexed as

COVID-19Quality of LifeAdultAgedFemaleHospitalizationHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromePrevalenceProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexCOVID-19PatientsPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID40940063
PMCPMC12519329

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.