SynthesisScientific reports2025
Effects of sport specific unplanned movements on ankle kinetics and kinematics in healthy athletes from systematic review with meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Unplanned movement tasks requiring rapid decision-making: a scoping review of study characteristics and methodological approaches.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Adaptive ensemble sizing with reinforcement learning for real-time ankle injury detection in wearable sensor systems.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lower limb injuries are common in team sports, often occurring during athletic tasks with high cognitive demands, such as time-constrained decision-making. This systematic review and meta-analysis used robust variance estimation to compare ankle biomechanics during unplanned (time-constrained) versus pre-planned (no decision-making) tasks. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals were pooled to assess differences in ankle kinematics and kinetics. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect (until April 2025). Trials assessing ankle kinematics and/or kinetics during pre-planned and unplanned jump-landing or cutting tasks in healthy athletes were included. The GRADE approach was used to rate the certainty of evidence for each outcome as low, moderate, or high. Fifteen trials (162 men, 152 women) with fair to high methodological quality (modified Downs and Black checklist) were identified. In the sagittal plane, low to moderate certainty evidence indicated higher ankle plantarflexion angles during unplanned movement (SMD = 0.27, p = .017). Subgroup analyses showed this effect was most evident in run-and-cut tasks, at initial ground contact, and among elite athletes (SMD = 0.24 to 0.36, p = .017 to .045). Sensitivity analysis excluding outliers indicated low-certainty evidence of increased ankle dorsiflexion angles during unplanned tasks (SMD = 0.25, p = .044), predominantly during the stance phase. Unplanned sports movements may increase ankle plantar- and dorsiflexion, but their impact on injury risk remains uncertain, as these changes may also reflect performance or protective adaptations. Due to the limited number of studies, low certainty of the available evidence, small effect sizes in the sagittal plane, and limited findings in the frontal and transverse planes, further research is warranted to draw more specific conclusions. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024598492 (date of registration: 18 October 2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.