ReviewOdontology2026
Reconceptualizing gingival keratinization: from epithelial autonomy to artificial intelligence-driven therapeutic planning.
Review in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gingival keratinization is critical for homeostasis of periodontal health, which has been previously thought to be connective tissue (CT) driven. Recent data refute that model instead of supporting it, implicating epithelial-intrinsic factors and local environmental signals as the dominant regulators of keratinization. This review critically appraises the role of CT in gingival keratinization and other possible mechanisms. A comprehensive review was conducted on literature from animal models, human case studies, and genetic research comparing the classical CT-directed model with recent hypotheses emphasizing keratinocyte autonomy. Studies on heterotopic gingival grafts, growth factor signaling, and keratinocyte differentiation were analyzed to assess the relative contributions of CT and epithelial factors in keratinization. Artificial intelligence driven predictive modelling was utilised to assess gingival keratinization. Analysis revealed that keratinization is not solely dictated by the CT. Instead, epithelial factors such as local signaling molecules, growth factors (TGF-β, KGF), and intrinsic genetic regulation of keratinocytes also play a dominant role. Studies on keratinocyte behaviour in the absence of CT support this hypothesis, suggesting epithelial differentiation occurs independently of CT signals. This review shifts the paradigm of gingival keratinization from a CT-driven model to an epithelial-mediated process. These findings have significant implications for periodontal regenerative therapies, emphasizing the modulation of epithelial factors over conventional CT grafting techniques for more effective soft tissue regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40940557What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.