ArticleCJEM2025
Timeframe for suspecting typhoid fever post-travel in Canadian children.
Article in CJEM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTyphoid fever, caused by Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi, remains a concern in non-endemic regions, particularly for travelers returning from endemic areas, as it can cause severe systemic infections. Complications, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, could be avoided with timely diagnosis and management, and the optimal timeframe for clinical suspicion post-travel remains debated. This study aimed to determine the post-travel period during which clinicians should suspect typhoid fever in children returning to Canada.
methodsThis was a secondary analysis of two cohort studies conducted in a tertiary care pediatric hospital in Montreal, Canada between 2018 and 2024. The full cohorts included all children with positive blood cultures from the emergency department (ED), while this study focusses on Salmonella Typhi bacteremia. The primary outcome was the number of days between return to Canada and positive blood culture. Independent variables included age, sex, fever at triage, country visited, and medical history. For participants who had traveled, the analysis focused on the time, in days, between the date of return from travel and presentation at the ED.
resultsOut 38,541 blood cultures drawn, 368 bacteremia cases were identified. Of these, seven (1.9%) were caused by Salmonella Typhi. The median delay between return and presentation was 23 days (range: 7-49 days). Four patients had traveled to India and two to Pakistan, with four of the six cases presented to the ED more than 3 weeks post-travel. One patient had not traveled but had exposure to a potential carrier returning from Ivory Coast. Of note, most cases were initially misdiagnosed as viral illness. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Our small study demonstrated delays up to 7 weeks between travel and clinical presentation of typhoid fever in a cohort of children in a Canadian ED. This emphasizes the importance of collecting travel history in febrile children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40940594What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.