ReviewCells2025
Integrating Multi-Omics in Endometrial Cancer: From Molecular Insights to Clinical Applications.
Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status and targeted therapies in endometrial cancer: Molecular classification-driven treatment strategies (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Integrating artificial intelligence and multi-omics data for precision oncology in endometrial cancer: a narrative review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Redefining the Treatment Landscape of Advanced Endometrial Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology.Cancers · 2026Review
- Role of claudin-6 in high-grade endometrial carcinoma: Implications for risk stratification and personalized treatment strategies.World journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries, and its incidence is increasing globally. While early-stage ECs generally show good prognosis, advanced or recurrent cases and those with aggressive histologic subtypes exhibit poor outcomes. Traditional histopathologic classification, however, fails to reflect the molecular heterogeneity of EC, limiting its role in guiding treatment. Recent developments in multi-omics have enhanced our understanding of EC biology, which supports more personalized treatment strategies. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification has provided a more systematic molecular framework for stratifying risk and identifying prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers. This review discusses the latest developments in multi-omics-based classification of EC, highlights emerging diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, and summarizes ongoing clinical trials that aim to translate molecular discoveries into improved outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.