Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40940896›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Machine Learning Models for Predicting Gynecological Cancers: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Pankaj Garg, Madhu Krishna, Prakash Kulkarni, David Horne, Ravi Salgia, Sharad S Singhal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pankaj GargDepartment of Chemistry, GLA University, NH-19, Mathura-Delhi Road, Mathura 281406, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Madhu KrishnaDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutic Research, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, 1500 E Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Prakash KulkarniDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutic Research, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, 1500 E Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
David HorneDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, 1500 E Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Ravi SalgiaDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutic Research, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, 1500 E Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Sharad S SinghalDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutic Research, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, 1500 E Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.

Funding

Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Victoria L. Seewaldt · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572United States Department of Defense W81XWH-22-1-0331, HT9425-25-1-0500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gynecological cancer, especially breast, cervical, and ovarian cancer, are significant health issues affecting women worldwide. When screened they are mostly detected at later stages because of non-specific signs and symptoms as well as the unavailability of reliable screening methods. The improvement of early oncologic prediction methods is therefore needed to work out the survival rates, guide individualized treatment, and relieve healthcare pressures. Outcome forecasting and clinical detection are rapidly changing with the use of machine learning (ML), one of the promising technologies used to analyze complex biomedical data. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based ML models are capable of determining low-level trends and making accurate predictions of disease risk and outcomes, because they can combine different datasets (clinical records, genomics, proteomics, medical imaging) and learn to identify subtle patterns. Standard algorithms, including support vector machines, random forests, and deep learning (DL) models, such as convolutional neural networks, have demonstrated high potential in identifying the type of cancer, monitoring disease progression, and designing treatment patterns. This manuscript reviews the recent developments in the use of ML models to advance oncologic prediction tasks in gynecologic oncology. It reports on critical domains, like screening, risk classification, and survival modeling, as well as comments on difficulties, like data inconsistency, inability of interpretation of models, and issues of clinical interpretation. New developments, such as explainable AI, federated learning (FL), and multi-omics fusion, are discussed to develop these models and to make them applicable in practice because of their reliability. Conclusively, this article emphasizes the transformative role of ML in precision oncology to deliver improved, patient-centered outcomes to women who are victims of gynecological cancers.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence in oncologyearly cancer detectiongynecological cancersmachine learningmulti-omics integrationpersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID40940896
PMCPMC12427352

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.