ReviewCancers2025
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Gynecological Cancers: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The gut microbiota-obesity axis in the pathogenesis and prognosis of breast cancer.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Gynecologic Oncology: Current Applications, Clinical Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Cureus · 2026Review
- Chemoresistance in gynecologic cancers: mechanistic insights and emerging platforms to overcome drug failure.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Genetically predicted inflammatory cytokines mediate the associations between the gut microbiota and ovarian cancer: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-based miRNA analysis for precision oncology: diagnostic and prognostic insights.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Prognostic impact of adenomyosis in cervical cancer: insights from machine learning-driven survival analysis.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gynecological cancer, especially breast, cervical, and ovarian cancer, are significant health issues affecting women worldwide. When screened they are mostly detected at later stages because of non-specific signs and symptoms as well as the unavailability of reliable screening methods. The improvement of early oncologic prediction methods is therefore needed to work out the survival rates, guide individualized treatment, and relieve healthcare pressures. Outcome forecasting and clinical detection are rapidly changing with the use of machine learning (ML), one of the promising technologies used to analyze complex biomedical data. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based ML models are capable of determining low-level trends and making accurate predictions of disease risk and outcomes, because they can combine different datasets (clinical records, genomics, proteomics, medical imaging) and learn to identify subtle patterns. Standard algorithms, including support vector machines, random forests, and deep learning (DL) models, such as convolutional neural networks, have demonstrated high potential in identifying the type of cancer, monitoring disease progression, and designing treatment patterns. This manuscript reviews the recent developments in the use of ML models to advance oncologic prediction tasks in gynecologic oncology. It reports on critical domains, like screening, risk classification, and survival modeling, as well as comments on difficulties, like data inconsistency, inability of interpretation of models, and issues of clinical interpretation. New developments, such as explainable AI, federated learning (FL), and multi-omics fusion, are discussed to develop these models and to make them applicable in practice because of their reliability. Conclusively, this article emphasizes the transformative role of ML in precision oncology to deliver improved, patient-centered outcomes to women who are victims of gynecological cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.