ArticleCancers2025
Precision Oncology Insights into WNT Pathway Alterations in FOLFOX-Treated Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in High-Risk Populations.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Guided Analysis of WNT Pathway Alterations: Associations with Genomic Burden and Survival Across African American and Non-Hispanic White Populations, Age Groups, and FOLFOX Treatment in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Analysis of WNT Pathway Dysregulation in Bevacizumab-Treated Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Uncovering molecular pathways in appendiceal cancer: A comprehensive characterization for precision oncology.American journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Integration Suggests TP53 Pathway Alterations as Prognostic Biomarkers in Populations with Disproportionate Health Burdens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesEarly-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as diagnosis before age 50, is rising rapidly and disproportionately affects Hispanic/Latino (H/L) populations. While FOLFOX is a standard first-line chemotherapy, its impact on tumor genomics in EOCRC remains poorly understood. Given the central role of WNT signaling in colorectal cancer (CRC), we aimed to characterize WNT pathway alterations in EOCRC across diverse populations and assess their associations with FOLFOX treatment and clinical outcomes.
methodsSomatic mutation data from 2515 CRC patients (266 H/L, 2249 Non-Hispanic White [NHW]) were analyzed. Patients were stratified by age (EOCRC vs. late-onset colorectal cancer), ancestry (H/L vs. NHW), and FOLFOX treatment status. Mutation frequencies in WNT pathway genes were compared, and Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival.
resultsWNT pathway alterations were pervasive across groups, with APC mutations dominating. Notably, non-canonical WNT mutations (e.g., CTNNB1, RNF43) were significantly less frequent in FOLFOX-treated H/L EOCRC patients compared to untreated individuals, suggesting potential chemotherapy-driven selection. In NHW patients, FOLFOX treatment was associated with reduced mutation frequencies across multiple WNT regulators, which correlated with improved overall survival.
conclusionsOur findings reveal that WNT pathway dysregulation in EOCRC is shaped by ancestry, treatment status, and age. FOLFOX appears to reduce specific WNT alterations in H/L patients and broader WNT disruptions in NHW patients, with survival benefits observed primarily in the latter. These results underscore ancestry-specific molecular responses to chemotherapy and the need for precision oncology strategies tailored to high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.