ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Food Preservatives and the Rising Tide of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms, Controversies, and Emerging Innovations.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Ozonated Vegetable Oils as Antimicrobial and Functional Agents in Food Systems: A Systematic Narrative Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Study on the Potential Molecular Mechanisms of Sodium Dehydroacetate (Na-DHA) Interfering With Bone Metabolism and Inducing Osteoporosis Based on Network Toxicology, Molecular Docking, and In Vitro Experimental Validation.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Food preservatives: natural or synthetic?Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Cancer and Environmental Xenobiotics: Mechanisms, Controversies, and Innovations.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is emerging as a significant global health concern, particularly among individuals under the age of 50. This alarming trend has coincided with an increase in the consumption of processed foods that often rely heavily on synthetic preservatives. At the same time, these additives play a critical role in ensuring food safety and shelf life. Growing evidence suggests that they may contribute to adverse gut health outcomes, which is a known risk factor in colorectal cancer development. At the same time, synthetic preservatives serve essential roles such as preventing microbial spoilage, maintaining color, and prolonging shelf life. Natural preservatives, on the other hand, not only provide antimicrobial protection but also exhibit antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. These contrasting functions form the basis of current discussions on their safety and health implications. Despite their widespread use, the long-term health implications of synthetic preservatives remain inadequately understood. This review synthesizes recent clinical, epidemiological, mechanistic, and toxicological data to examine the potential link between synthetic food preservatives and EOCRC. Particular focus is placed on compounds that have been associated with DNA damage, gut microbiota disruption, oxidative stress, and chronic inflammation, which are the mechanisms that collectively increase cancer risk. In contrast, natural preservatives derived from plants and microbes are gaining attention for their antioxidant, antimicrobial, and possible anti-inflammatory effects. While these alternatives show promise, scientific validation and regulatory approval remain limited. This review highlights the urgent need for more rigorous, long-term human studies and advocates for enhanced regulatory oversight. It advocates for a multidisciplinary approach to developing safer preservation strategies and highlights the importance of public education in making informed dietary choices. Natural preservatives, though still under investigation, may offer a safer path forward in mitigating EOCRC risk and shaping future food and health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.