Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40941201›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Spillover Effects of Food Safety Incidents: Role of Consumers' Heterogeneous Safety Preferences.

Fang Ren, Jin Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fang RenCollege of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Jin FanCollege of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1043-1539

Funding

Major Project of the National Social Science Foundation of China: Research on the Path to Effectively Prevent Stagflation Risks in China's Economy during the 14th Five-Year Plan Period Project No. 21&ZD081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study considers consumers' risk perceptions and safety preferences as external shock factors in food safety incidents. These factors are incorporated into a general equilibrium model defined by the food safety hierarchy, and the computational experiment method is employed to examine the direction of spillover effects. According to the findings, the spillover direction and intensity of food safety incidents are jointly influenced by the characteristics of consumers, food and the market. When an incident raises consumers' safety concerns, a negative effect occurs throughout all food sectors. When an incident has a specific impact on consumers' risk perception, the direction of the spillover is contingent upon the safety level of the product in question. In the event that the food involved in an incident is extremely secure, it may have a detrimental effect on unrelated food goods; conversely, it may have a beneficial effect on unrelated food goods. The incident's impact has increased in proportion to the market share of the affected food. When the market share remains constant, the impact intensity increases as the degree of food safety improves. Higher market-wide risk levels are associated with more pronounced and quicker effects. This study improves understanding of spillover patterns in food safety situations, which aids in the formulation of focused policy responses and initiatives.

Indexed as

food safety incidentsfood safety levelgeneral equilibrium modelmarket riskmarket sharerisk perceptionsecurity preference

Identifiers

PMID40941201
PMCPMC12427703

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.