Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40941368›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Using Quinoa Grain (

Artem Yu Zagarin, Aleksandra V Shitikova, Marina I Selionova, Sergey V Akchurin, Marianna Yu Gladkikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Artem Yu ZagarinDepartment of Animal Breeding, Genetics and Biotechnology, Institute of Animal Science and Biology, Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 49 Timiryazevskaya Str., Moscow 127434, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3782-3903
Aleksandra V ShitikovaDepartment of Plant Production and Meadow Ecosystems, Institute of Agrobiotechnology, Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 49 Timiryazevskaya Str., Moscow 127434, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5943-0430
Marina I SelionovaDepartment of Animal Breeding, Genetics and Biotechnology, Institute of Animal Science and Biology, Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 49 Timiryazevskaya Str., Moscow 127434, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9501-8080
Sergey V AkchurinDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Animal Science and Biology, Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 49 Timiryazevskaya Str., Moscow 127434, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6822-0013
Marianna Yu GladkikhDepartment of Animal Breeding, Genetics and Biotechnology, Institute of Animal Science and Biology, Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 49 Timiryazevskaya Str., Moscow 127434, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2304-6058

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 075-15-2025-102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the effects of native quinoa grain with a high saponin content and quinoa grain subjected to preliminary saponin removal with low saponin content on growth, meat quality, biochemical blood composition, and the expression of genes related to muscle growth, gut health, and nutrient transport in broiler chickens. The control group of chickens received a standard diet. The SAP group feed contained quinoa grain without saponin removal (saponin level-5.20%) at 3% of the "Starter" feed mass and 5% of the "Grower" and "Finisher" feeds, maintaining the same nutritional values as the control group. The SAP-FREE group feed contained quinoa grain that was pre-treated to remove saponins by washing with water for 60 min at a temperature of 50 °C (saponin level-0.24%) in the same amount as the SAP group. The research results indicated certain advantages of unprocessed quinoa grain in relation to saponin content. Specifically, in the SAP group, the broiler performance index was at the same level as the control, while the SAP-FREE group had a high mortality rate (10%), resulting in a performance index that was 23.82 units lower than the control. The use of quinoa grain with high saponin content promoted better development of thigh muscles by 9.6% compared to the control (

Indexed as

animal nutrigenomicsgut healthnon-traditional feedspoultry feeding

Identifiers

PMID40941368
PMCPMC12427347

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.