ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Efficient Deep Learning-Based Arrhythmia Detection Using Smartwatch ECG Electrocardiograms.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Global Scoping Review of Diagnostic, Symptom-Based, and Outcome Prediction Approaches.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- POC Sensor Systems and Artificial Intelligence-Where We Are Now and Where We Are Going?Biosensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
According to the World Health Organization, cardiovascular diseases, including cardiac arrhythmias, are the leading cause of death worldwide due to their silent, asymptomatic nature. To address this problem, early and accurate diagnosis is crucial. Although this task is typically performed by a cardiologist, diagnosing arrhythmias can be imprecise due to the subjectivity of reading and interpreting electrocardiograms (ECGs), and electrocardiograms are often subject to noise and interference. Deep learning-based approaches present methods for automatically detecting arrhythmias and are positioned as an alternative to support cardiologists' diagnoses. However, these methods are trained and tested only on open datasets of electrocardiograms from Holter devices, whose results aim to improve the accuracy of the state of the art, neglecting the efficiency of the model and its application in a practical clinical context. In this work, we propose an efficient model based on a 1D CNN architecture to detect arrhythmias from smartwatch ECGs, for subsequent deployment in a practical scenario for the monitoring and early detection of arrhythmias. Two datasets were used: UMass Medical School Simband for a binary arrhythmia detection model to evaluate its efficiency and effectiveness, and the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database to validate the multiclass model and compare it with state-of-the-art models. The results of the binary model achieved an accuracy of 64.81%, a sensitivity of 89.47%, and a specificity of 6.25%, demonstrating the model's reliability, especially in specificity. Furthermore, the computational complexity was 1.2 million parameters and 68.48 MFlops, demonstrating the efficiency of the model. Finally, the results of the multiclass model achieved an accuracy of 99.57%, a sensitivity of 99.57%, and a specificity of 99.47%, making it one of the best state-of-the-art proposals and also reconfirming the reliability of the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.