Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40943307›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Rodent Models of Lung Disease: A Road Map for Translational Research.

Jerome Cantor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jerome CantorSt John's School of Pharmacy and Allied Health Sciences, St John's University, 8000 Utopia Parkway Queens, Queens, NY 11439, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal models provide a controlled and reproducible environment for investigating the pathogenesis of human lung diseases. In many cases, the morphological changes associated with a particular model may resemble those seen in their human counterparts, but the corresponding biochemical events may differ, and their timeframe may be significantly reduced. Nevertheless, gaining insight into human disease mechanisms may be possible by employing experimental approaches that minimize the problems associated with extrapolating data from animal studies. Such strategies include using more than one model of a particular disease, employing different routes of administration of the injurious agent, using a variety of animal strains or species, or focusing on biochemical mechanisms common to both the animal model and its human counterpart. For example, rodent models that replicate elastic fiber injury in human pulmonary emphysema have been used to test aerosolized hyaluronan's ability to slow the disease's progression. The same models facilitated the identification of a new biomarker for pulmonary emphysema that may be a real-time indicator of therapeutic efficacy in clinical trials. Therefore, the appropriate use of these models can provide a necessary road map for designing appropriate dosages, delivery routes, timeframes, and endpoints in clinical trials of novel agents for the treatment of lung disease.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalLung DiseasesTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsBiomarkersHumansHyaluronic AcidPulmonary EmphysemaRodentiaBiomarkersHyaluronic AcidALIanimal modelshyaluronanpulmonary emphysemapulmonary fibrosis

Identifiers

PMID40943307
PMCPMC12429320

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.