ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Rodent Models of Lung Disease: A Road Map for Translational Research.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lipid droplet-mitochondria contact sites as druggable spatial-pharmacology targets in respiratory disease: cross-cell-type mechanisms and translational strategies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Unveiling Particulate Matter-Lung Interactions from Static Models to Dynamic Lung-on-Chips.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Beyond the Critical Threshold: Elastic Fiber Remodeling and Fracture in the Pathogenesis of Pulmonary Emphysema.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal models provide a controlled and reproducible environment for investigating the pathogenesis of human lung diseases. In many cases, the morphological changes associated with a particular model may resemble those seen in their human counterparts, but the corresponding biochemical events may differ, and their timeframe may be significantly reduced. Nevertheless, gaining insight into human disease mechanisms may be possible by employing experimental approaches that minimize the problems associated with extrapolating data from animal studies. Such strategies include using more than one model of a particular disease, employing different routes of administration of the injurious agent, using a variety of animal strains or species, or focusing on biochemical mechanisms common to both the animal model and its human counterpart. For example, rodent models that replicate elastic fiber injury in human pulmonary emphysema have been used to test aerosolized hyaluronan's ability to slow the disease's progression. The same models facilitated the identification of a new biomarker for pulmonary emphysema that may be a real-time indicator of therapeutic efficacy in clinical trials. Therefore, the appropriate use of these models can provide a necessary road map for designing appropriate dosages, delivery routes, timeframes, and endpoints in clinical trials of novel agents for the treatment of lung disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.