ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Effects of Nitric Oxide Expression on Hearing Loss.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The role of nitric oxide (NO) in the onset and pathogenesis of hearing loss remains a matter of debate. To address this, we conducted a narrative review of the literature on the subject. We performed a literature search of SCOPUS, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases on the production and role of NO in hearing loss using the search terms/strategy "nitric oxide" AND "hearing loss" to ensure a comprehensive review of available studies. Results: Of 186 papers initially retrieved, 166 were unrelated to hearing loss and NO and were excluded. Of the 23 papers ultimately reviewed, 58% (12 articles) reported that NO caused or worsened hearing loss, 26% (5 articles) reported a beneficial effect of NO in the treatment of and/or defense against hearing loss, and 16% (3 articles) reached no firm conclusion on whether NO played a positive or negative role. This review highlights the dual role of NO in auditory health, where it is essential for normal cochlear function through regulation of blood flow and neurotransmission. However, excessive or dysregulated NO production, particularly via inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), can lead to oxidative stress and hearing loss. Conversely, NO also exhibits protective effects in certain contexts, such as reducing noise-induced hearing damage through its antioxidant properties. These findings underscore the potential of NO modulation as a therapeutic strategy for hearing loss, emphasizing the need for further research to optimize its application and understand the conditions under which it is beneficial or harmful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.