Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40943342›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Stem Cell Niche Concept: Search for Current Expert Consensus.

Igor Khlusov, Larisa Litvinova, Anastasia Efimenko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Igor KhlusovDepartment of Morphology and General Pathology, Siberian State Medical University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3465-8452
Larisa LitvinovaCenter for Immunology and Cellular Biotechnology, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 636016 Kaliningrad, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5231-6910
Anastasia EfimenkoMedical Research and Educational Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0696-1369

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 19-75-30007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postnatal stem cells are crucial for tissue homeostasis and repair and are regulated by specialized microenvironmental microterritories known as "stem cell niches". Proposed by R. Schofield in 1978 for hematopoietic stem cells, niches maintain self-renewal, guide differentiation and maturation, and can even revert progenitor cells to an undifferentiated state. Niches respond to injury, oxygen levels, mechanical cues, and signaling molecules. While the niche concept has advanced regenerative medicine, bioengineering, and 3D bioprinting, further progress is hindered by inconsistent interpretations of its core principles. To address this, we proposed a consensus-building initiative among experts in regenerative medicine and bioengineering. We have developed a questionnaire covering the niche topography, hierarchy, dimension, geometry, composition, regulatory mechanisms, and specifically the mesenchymal stem cell niches. This pilot survey, being conducted under the auspices of the National Society for Regenerative Medicine in the Russian Federation, aims to establish a standardized framework on the eve of the 50th anniversary of Schofield's hypothesis. The resulting consensus will guide future research and innovation in this pivotal field.

Indexed as

Stem Cell NicheAnimalsCell DifferentiationConsensusConsensus Statements as TopicHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsRegenerative Medicinebone marrow microenvironmentexpert consensushematopoietic stem cellshierarchymammalsmesenchymal stromal/stem cellsstem cell niche

Identifiers

PMID40943342
PMCPMC12429054

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.