Evidence mapPaperPMID 40943504Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Molecular and Cellular Effects of CT Scans in Human Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Maxim Ignatov, Ekaterina E Markelova, Anna Chigasova, Andrey Osipov, Ilia Buianov, Yuriy Fedotov, Petr Eremin, Natalia Vorobyeva, Nikolay Zyuzikov, Andreyan N Osipov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maxim IgnatovN.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina E MarkelovaFederal Research Centre Fundamentals of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0007-0628-7582
Anna ChigasovaN.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Andrey OsipovN.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3120-8512
Ilia BuianovState Research Center-Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency (SRC-FMBC), 123098 Moscow, Russia.
Yuriy FedotovN.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Petr EreminNational Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 121099 Moscow, Russia.
Natalia VorobyevaN.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Nikolay ZyuzikovDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine 999183, Trinidad and Tobago.ORCID 0000-0003-4086-2724
Andreyan N OsipovN.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5921-9056

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 23-14-00078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An open question in radiobiology concerns whether low doses of radiation are harmful or if cells are able to tolerate such exposure with minimal or no disruption. This issue is relevant for evaluating public health risks associated with the increasing number of medical computed tomography (CT) diagnostic procedures. This study evaluated the impact of CT scan-level exposure on human adipose mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) by measuring DNA damage responses (γH2AX, 53BP1, pATM foci), proliferation (Ki-67), senescence (β-galactosidase), and multiple gene expressions. Responses to one or five CT exposures were compared to a 2 Gy X-ray dose at intervals from 1 h to 10 passages post-irradiation. It was shown that CT scan briefly increased DNA damage markers but showed no significant long-term effects. A high dose of 2 Gy X-ray exposure caused sustained DNA damage, decreased proliferation, increased senescence, and significant changes in hundreds of genes even after several cell generations. After a single CT exposure, gene expression changes were minimal, while high-dose exposure led to strong activation of DNA repair and stress response pathways. Five CT scans caused a slight activation of

Indexed as

Adipose TissueMesenchymal Stem CellsTomography, X-Ray ComputedCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCellular SenescenceDNA DamageDNA RepairDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumanscellular proliferationDNA damageDNA repair focigene expressionlow dosesmesenchymal stem cellstranscriptomicsX-raysСТ scans

Identifiers

PMID40943504
PMCPMC12428932

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.